Conflict resolution Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Conflict gag rule - Case Study ExampleEnvironmentalists and executives of a company impeach of polluting a stream meet to resolve their differences at a university-run mediation center in the Southeast. every last(predicate) of these examples are small-arm of a new counselling of dealing with fight.These new approaches to conflict are commonly referred to by the general term conflict resolution. Something whose roots can be traced to four (sometimes separate, sometimes intertwining) movements, every(prenominal) of which began in the mid-1960s and early seventies (1) new developments in organizational relations (2) the introduction of the problem-solving workshop in international relations (3) a redirection of ghostlike figures from activist work in peace-related endeavors to an emphasis upon peacemaking and (4) the criticism of lawyers and the judiciary system by the general public that resulted in what is known as alternative dispute resolution (ADR).These four movements, which comprise the major divisions in the new field of conflict resolution, are all part of a more encompassing phenomenon in recent American history--the realization that the bureaucratization of the modern world has resulted in extreme depersonalization. This realization resulted in the inquiring of legitimate authority characteristic of the 1960s and early 1970s in America. Thus, the emergence of the field of conflict resolution must be seen in the context of the bigger framework of social and cultural interpolate in American society. In the United States, as in all industrialized societies, legitimacy is based on authority embodied in the legal system, bureaucratic administration, and centralization. Indeed, we live in a society characterized by the rationalization of law, centralization and concentration within industry, and the accompanying extension of state intervention to previously private human actions. Like the civil rights movement, the womens liberation movement, th e anti-Vietnam warfare movement, and the questioning of every major institutional order in the 1960s, conflict resolution was born in a time of questioning whether traditional legal authority served the needs of people or back up a status quo that reinforced social and political inequality. The 1960s ushered in a time of switch and conflict. It was perceived by an active and vocal, if not large, part of the population that change was good, and the conflict that often produced the change was also a positive thing and not something to be avoided. Each of the four movements in conflict resolution, in their own unique way, represents a challenge to traditional authority, a part of this new way of looking at change and conflict. In the area of organizational relations this took the form of a questioning of top-down, centralized decision making and the role conflict played in organizations. In international relations, the mightiness paradigm (the view that there are severe limitations to political reform because human beings are power-seeking creatures by nature and must be controlled by strong government action) was challenged via the notion that human beings seek to replete their basic needs rather than always seeking power and material interests. In certain religious organizations this took the form of an emphasis upon the religious communitys ability to